From Hijra/Khusra to Transgender: Changing Language and Identity in Jammu (J&K)
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.66871/ihj.v1i1.012##semicolon##
Gender History##common.commaListSeparator## Transgender Communities##common.commaListSeparator## Hijra##common.commaListSeparator## Khusra##common.commaListSeparator## Language and Identity##common.commaListSeparator## Colonial Discourse##common.commaListSeparator## Jammu and Kashmir##common.commaListSeparator## Jammu##article.abstract##
The words used to describe gender-diverse people in India carry more than description; they carry judgments about who belongs, who is respectable, and who is owed the protections of citizenship. This paper traces how the terminology or language used for transgender communities in Jammu has changed from Hijra and Khusra to the now officially recognized category as Transgender. This change has never been a simple substitution of one word for another. Combining historical discourse analysis with oral history, together with in-depth interviews with twenty-two transgender women in Jammu, conducted between 2023 and 2025. It shows how colonial law reshaped gender-diverse communities as objects of surveillance, postcolonial India inherited this suspicion informally, and the 2014 NALSA judgment introduced rights-based vocabulary that joined rather than replaced older terms. In present-day Jammu, Hijra, Khusra, Kinner, and Transgender circulate simultaneously; each carrying a different history, institutional home, and claim to legitimacy. I call this phenomenon “layered discursive coexistence”, wherein individuals navigate multiple naming regimes strategically. This coexistence has generated a class-inflected respectability discourse. “Transgender” signals education and independence, while “Hijra”/“Kinner” remain tied to ritual labour and economic dependency. The paper offers a regionally grounded history of gendered language in region typically read only through security and conflict.
##submission.citations##
Bhattacharya, S., Ghosh, D., & Bandana Purkayastha. (2022). ‘Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act’ of India: An Analysis of Substantive Access to Rights of a Transgender Community. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 14(2), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac004
Dutta, A. (2012). An Epistemology of Collusion:Hijras,Kothisand the Historical (Dis)continuity of Gender/Sexual Identities in Eastern India. Gender & History, 24(3), 825–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2012.01712.x
Dutta, A. (2013). Legible Identities and Legitimate Citizens: The Globalization Of Transgender And Subjects Of Hiv-Aids Prevention In Eastern India. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(4), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2013.818279
Dutta, A. (2014). Contradictory Tendencies: The Supreme Court’s NALSA Judgment on Transgender Recognition and Rights. https://jilsblognujs.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/anirudda-dutta.pdf
Dutta, A. (2019). Dissenting differently: Solidarities and tensions between student organizing and trans-kothi-hijra activism in eastern India. SAMAJ: South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 20. https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/5210
Dutta, A., & Roy, R. (2014). Decolonizing Transgender in India: Some Reflections. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2685615
Hinchy, J. (2019). Governing gender and sexuality in colonial India: The hijra, c. 1850–1900. Cambridge University Press.
Khaitan, T. (2014). NALSA v Union of India: What courts say, what courts do. UK Constitutional Law Association Blog. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/04/24/tarunabh-khaitan-nalsa-v-union-of-india-what-courts-say-what-courts-do/
Mount, L. (2020). “I am not a hijra”: Class, respectability, and the emergence of the “new” transgender woman in India. Gender & Society, 34(4), 620–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220932275
Nanda, S. (1999). Neither man nor woman: The hijras of India (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Pub. Co.
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438 (India).
Preston, L. W. (1987). A right to exist: Eunuchs and the state in nineteenth-century India. Modern Asian Studies, 21(2), 371–387.
Reddy, G. (2005). With respect to sex: Negotiating hijra identity in South India. University of Chicago Press.
Saria, V. (2021). Hijras, lovers, brothers: Surviving sex and poverty in rural India. Fordham University Press.
The Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 (Act No. XXVII of 1871) (India).
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 (Act No. 40 of 2019) (India).
Vanita, R., & Kidwai, S. (Eds.). (2000). Same-sex love in India: Readings from literature and history. New York : St. Martin’s Press
Venkatesan , V. (2025). Beyond the binary: Supreme Court reclaims the promise of transgender equality - Supreme Court Observer. Supreme Court Observer. https://www.scobserver.in/journal/beyond-the-binary-supreme-court-reclaims-the-promise-of-transgender-equality/